Mary Jo Sharp, of Confident Christianity, recently wrote a commentary on the second Loftus-Wood debate on the Problem of Evil: "Loftus-Wood Round Two: Another Failed Argument from Evil."
The debate was recently made available as a free Podcast. Click here to listen to the two-hour exchange. I look foward to comments.
The Venus de Milo
Like Venus, the world is quite beautiful, but full of problems.
Blog Archive
Theist Sites (Dealing with the Problem of Evil)
Non-Theist Sites (Dealing with the Problem of Evil)
Suggested Reading
- Candide (Voltaire)
- Night (Elie Wiesel)
- The Brothers Karamazov (Dostoevsky)
- The Rape of Nanking (Iris Chang)
- Till We Have Faces (C.S. Lewis)
About Me
- David Wood
- The Bronx, New York, United States
- I'm currently working on my PhD in philosophy. My focus is the Problem of Evil.
5 comments:
I was interested in understanding what you were saying, since some of it was new. But at the end I didn't feel like I could get a word in edge-wise. I guess one way to win a debate is to keep your opponent from talking.
I'll review her review sometime soon.
Oh, and what about hell?
David,
I did notice the second half of the debate was a little heavy on the David Wood side. I understand that you were trying to make sure that your point came across exactly how you meant it, though.
John - what exactly are you asking about hell? It's existence?
Mary Jo
The hell thing is a joke between me and John. He always brings up hell when we discuss the Problem of Evil, so I started pointing it out. Now he tags it on at the end of his comments.
MJ,
I haven't listened to the debate yet, but if the second half was heavy on my side, this is probably because the power of my arguments is irresistible. :)
Yes, David. That must be the case, my friend. ;-)
Post a Comment